The Crystal Gryphon by Andre Norton

Crystal GryphonThe Crystal Gryphon is the reason I keep meaning to read more Andre Norton.  Another reread for Once Upon a Time, it’s a beautifully written book with a vivid world and excellent characters.

The narration alternates between our two leads, Kerovan and Joisan.  Kerovan was born of humans but with his taint of Old Blood showing in his amber eyes and hoofs.  He is shunned by his mother and grows up apart, despite being the son of a lord.  Wishing to affirm Kerovan as his heir, his father makes a political betrothal for him to Joisan.  She’s strong-minded and independent, but fiercely conscious of honor, duty and loyalty.  Officially married as children but never meeting, Kerovan and Joisan follow separate paths, until all plans change with the coming of invaders from across the sea.

I love Kerovan and Joisan, and the growth they each experience.  Kerovan in some ways comes to terms with his past and his differences–and in other ways does not, which is okay because there are two more books after this.  Joisan is always intelligent and strong, and in time of crisis she emerges as a leader for her people.

Without giving much away, Kerovan and Joisan do eventually meet.  I liked all of the book, but it felt most compelling when the characters came together–and in my memory, it stood out as a much larger section than it really is!  The development of the romance is brief, but felt satisfying too.

The culture and the world is immensely rich and complex, with several societies jostling together.  Kerovan and Joisan’s people have a feudal structure and loosely Medieval technology.  The invaders come with modern weaponry.  And all throughout the land, there are traces of the Old Ones, who possessed mysterious powers.  The book has some sense of a larger context, and apparently its part of Norton’s larger Witchworld series.  I don’t know much of the larger context, but I don’t feel like that was ever a barrier to reading.

I have a few criticisms…Norton relies a bit on characters experiencing compulsions, to make them do things that don’t entirely make sense but move the story forward.  Considering powerful magic and larger forces are woven throughout, though, I’ll mostly give that a pass.  The alternating POV is brilliant for getting into both characters, but can make the chronology confusing in places, when we jump backwards in the timeline with a POV shift.

But those are relatively minor issues, more than made up for by Norton’s beautiful writing style and wonderful characters.  Highly recommended–and I already got hold of the sequel.

Author’s Site: http://www.andre-norton.org/

Other reviews:
Rachel Manija
Angieville
Okay, more people should read this…hardly any reviews out there!

Buy it here: The Crystal Gryphon

Zombieland and Warm Bodies

As a general rule, I’m not much of one for zombie movies.  I’m not much of one for blood and guts in general, so…yeah.  But I had a movie night with friends recently, and watched Warm Bodies, which was really quite a bit of fun.  I watched Zombieland (with the same people) on a different occasion.  Since it’s another funny zombie movie, I thought–why not a joint review?

Zombieland (2009) focuses on the last handful of people left alive in a world overrun with zombies.  Jesse Eisenberg plays (of course) a shy, nerdy college student, who cites his survival to his list of rules–like Rule#1: Cardio, and Rule#4: Don’t be a hero.  The movie turns into a sort of strange, zombie-filled road trip–and of course one of the only other surviving humans happens to be an attractive girl (Emma Stone) the same age as the main character.

On the con side of things, there are some moments of zombie gore and guts (particularly in the first few minutes).  If you’re squeamish, watch with someone who has seen the movie and can warn you (that’s what I did).  As far as zombie movies go, it’s not really a heavily gory one, though (or so I’ve heard).  On the pro and con side, there’s an awesome, super tough girl…who then ultimately does something stupid and has to be rescued by the not-nearly-as-awesome guy.  Sigh.  But the whole thing is something of a geek-guy fantasy, so I suppose it’s just how it goes.

On the pro side–it’s frequently a very funny movie.  And–the Rules!  The Rules are how I ended up watching this to begin with.  I’m writing a novel with a character who has a list of rules for life–and I had never seen this movie.  Everyone in my writing group told me I had to watch Zombieland.

The Rules were awesome…but I feel cheated.  We hear about Rule #30, so there must be thirty rules, but we only actually hear maybe a dozen of them.  For the record, my character has around 35 rules, and they are all in the novel.

Aside from too few rules and too much gore, though, it’s a fun time.

Warm Bodies (2013) tells the story from the point of view of one of the zombies.  His name is R–he can’t remember the rest.  He’s pretty depressed about his non-life, and dreams of being able to connect with another person.  And one day, he does; he meets Julie, a human from a hold-out community of survivors, who R chooses to protect during a zombie attack.  The more time they spend together, the more R begins to change…

On the pro side, R has a fantastic inner monologue going on.  It’s witty and funny, offering commentary on life and on zombie tropes, and giving such an interesting insight into his head.  R has to work so hard to overcome his zombieness, and to connect with Julie–prompting monologue such as “Don’t be creepy, don’t be creepy…”

The gore level is a bit lower than Zombieland, although it does have its moments, so watch out.  On the pro and con sidethey do something really fascinating with the trope of zombies eating brains.  The idea is that eating someone’s brain enables the zombie, at least temporarily, to relive that person’s memories, and remember what it feels like to be alive.  If you can get past the ick factor (eating brains!), I love the concept.

On the con side, well, don’t expect much of this to make any kind of scientific sense.  R doesn’t remember how the zombie infection got started, and pretty much nothing about the nature of the zombies is explained or even seems terribly reasonable.  But honestly, it doesn’t matter that much.  I mean, it’s a surprisingly clever zombie movie with engaging characters.  For me, the science becomes secondary.

I’m still not a fan of zombies in general…but if you want a funny twist on zombies, these were a couple of good ones.

The Princess Bride by William Goldman

Princess Bride (2)We’re getting down to the end of Once Upon a Time, but I fit in another reread of an old favorite: The Princess Bride, S. Morganstern’s Classic Tale by William Goldman.  The first time I read this was in college, and it only took me a day.  I didn’t have quite so much reading time this go-around–so it took two and a half days.  It has a decent number of pages, but it’s a fast-paced, very quick, very delightful adventure story.

Plotwise, the story centers around Buttercup, the most beautiful woman in the world, who is engaged to Prince Humperdinck but in love with Westley.  But it’s not really about the plot, which is largely just a farcical blend of kidnapping, conspiracy theories, and excuses for swordfights.  It’s really about the other characters, the derring-do and the witty repartee, and the dangerous and sometimes absurd circumstances.

If you’ve seen the movie (my review here), then you’ll have a very good idea what to expect in the book.  I’ve rarely seen a movie that was so true to the book, and I’m sure that has everything to do with the fact that Goldman also wrote the screenplay.  They’re basically the same thing–the book is just a bit more.  More history of the characters, more descriptions, more witty asides.  But it’s the same in the essentials, and there were plenty of lines of dialogue I read in my head the way the actors said them.

The spoofing quality of the story may be one way the book is more.  The movie is obviously playing on adventure story tropes, but it’s even clearer in the book how much it’s deliberately poking fun at the standards.  You can see it in the main characters: the beautiful but dumb Buttercup, the impossibly heroic Westley, and the ruthless Humperdinck are all caricatures, but they’re knowingly caricatures, and they’re such entertaining ones besides.  This entire book feels like one big, sly wink.

For me, I think it’s much more about the supporting cast.  There’s Fezzik the giant who has the world’s strongest arms and biggest heart, who’s not very smart but loves rhymes, and is afraid of nothing so much as loneliness.  And there’s Inigo, a Wizard with a sword who is driven only by his desire to seek revenge on his beloved father’s murderer.  There’s also Vizzini, the brilliant and crafty Sicilian–but mostly it’s about Inigo and Fezzik.

We get more of Fezzik and Inigo and their friendship in the book.  One of my favorite sections is when the two of them enter the Zoo of Death, looking for Westley.  They both have to face fears and it’s clear that neither could make it through without the other one–and even though they squabble along the way, they seem to figure that out too.

The book has more or less the same frame story as the movie as well, though in the book it’s Goldman’s father reading him the book.  Frame story spoiler in white text, highlight if you want to read it…  The story goes that Goldman’s father read him only the good parts of the book, and now he’s abridging S. Morganstern’s classic tale…which just isn’t true.  It’s a lovely idea, but if you actually read the book, it becomes pretty clear that it’s not true (and a quick search online will confirm it), just from the style of the book itself, the things that Goldman claims to have cut, and especially the things Goldman writes about his own life.  I love the concept, though, and I love that the idea is floating out there and believed.   I think that’s why I had to do this part in white text–I wanted to comment on the whole thing, but I hate to give it away for anyone! Like I said, the book really is one huge, sly wink.

All in all, The Princess Bride is not a deep story or a profound one, but it’s just so much fun.  Watch the movie or read the book, both are light and delightful.

Other reviews:
Fresh-scraped Vellum
Shut Up! I’m Reading
Elle Literate
Hot Diggity Daffodil
Anyone else?

Buy it here: The Princess Bride

The Return of the King by J. R. R. Tolkien

Return of the KingI am very happy to report that I have finished reading the Lord of the Rings.  The Return of the King turned out to be much shorter than I always thought–only 340 pages (plus Appendices, which I skimmed…)  I might have read these books years ago if I’d had a clearer picture of their length!  But I’m happy I finally read them–and in time for Once Upon a Time.

The Return of the King finishes out the trilogy.  (Read my reviews of Fellowship and Two Towers, if you like.)  Like Towers, the book is really in two separate sections.  The first half deals with Sauron’s forces attacking Minas Tirith, capital city of Gondor, and the various forces rallying to fight him.  The second half brings us back to Frodo and Sam, and the final stretch of their quest–followed by a hundred pages of the aftermath.

Overall I enjoyed the book quite a lot, although parts of the first half dragged for me.  I enjoyed the setting, and there were wonderful moments in there, especially ones centering on Merry or Pippin.  I loved anything with Faramir or Eowyn (more on them in a bit), and Gimli had some nice moments too.

As I write this, it’s becoming even clearer to me why I liked some parts better than others.  It comes down to characters.  When the focus narrows down and is just on what one individual is doing, feeling, thinking, I was engaged.  When we pull out and it becomes the epic sweeping clash of armies, then it lost me.  I thought this part went on a bit too long in the movie too (until the Riders of Rohan showed up, because they always make battles awesome).

I was happy when we (finally) got back to Frodo and Sam.  I love their sections, because it’s exactly what I wanted in the previous section–we zero in close on Sam, and we get nearly all of the quest from his point of view.  It’s immediate, it’s personal, it pulls me into the story because I’m not watching an army, I’m pushing through Mordor with Sam.  It’s funny, I think of Tolkien as being a very dry, detached writer, but he really was capable of writing beautiful, deep character stories (just not often enough…)

There are two other parts I wanted to look at, and they’re very late in the book, so spoilers ahoy!

I was thrilled to pieces by the Faramir/Eowyn romance.  I knew it existed (and the extended cut of the movie did lovely things with it, even though it only got about a minute and a half of screentime) but I wasn’t expecting much.  By this point, if a woman was identified by name I felt like we were ahead.  So when there were actual conversations, and entire scenes, and really sweet, cute lines back and forth, and an exploration of Eowyn’s feelings…it was still probably only ten pages but it was beautiful.

I was expecting something much more like what the Aragorn/Arwen romance turned out to be–she shows up just in time to look pretty and marry him!  Otherwise, not really in the story.  (The Appendix fleshes it out a bit, but not much.)  So I was so happy to get something actually romantic for Faramir and Eowyn, and I just love the two of them as characters besides.  They’re two of the most relatable characters, because they struggle more than most.  Faramir’s father never thought he was as good as his brother; Eowyn chafes against society’s role for her.  Most of the characters here are great fun to read about, but too perfect in some ways.  I love that Faramir and Eowyn are awesome, but still human.  (I think it relates to a lot of the reasons of why I love Sam too…)

The other part I wanted to talk about–the Scouring of the Shire.  This section (and its exclusion from the movie) seems to be highly controversial among the faithful.  I have to say I didn’t mind the long wrap-up, and I didn’t mind the concept of trouble coming to the idyllic Shire.  It did bother me what the specific trouble was, though.  The whole trilogy exists in this very high fantasy, very Medieval realm.  Then we return to the Shire to find a metaphor (surely not an allegory…) about the Industrial Revolution and Communism.  Or so it felt, anyway.  And that jarred for me.  I’m also not quite sure when Merry and Pippin became generals…they were soldiers, yes, but when did they learn how to organize battle plans and command an army of Hobbits?

On the other hand, while the nature of the trouble felt strange, I actually quite liked it that there was work to do when they returned to the Shire.  The end of the movie feels very empty to me.  The whole time the Hobbits dreamed about returning to the Shire, but when they actually come back from their grand adventures and find nothing at home has changed…I don’t know, I always like to believe people can go home again, but it just seemed to me that they would all find their daily lives so meaningless and dull, after the incredible events that they’d been involved in.

I really liked that in the book, after saving the world, they had to save the Shire too.  The scale is smaller, but the work is just as important, and you could see how everything they had done then enabled them to become leaders in their own community and to set about making things better there too.

I feel like I should have some succint, summing up words here.  I’m happy that I finally filled in this gap in my fantasy knowledge by reading Lord of the Rings, and of course it wasn’t nearly as intimidating as I always thought.  The Two Towers is my favorite, book and movie, although there are wonderful moments in all three.

I don’t have plans to read The Silmarillion…but I am very much looking forward to the next movie installment of The Hobbit!

Author’s Site: http://www.tolkiensociety.org/

Other reviews:
Rawr Reader
Suzie Hunt
Carol Rae’s Random Ramblings
Arrow Through the Sun
Anyone else?

Buy it here: The Return of the King

The Hero and the Crown by Robin McKinley

Hero and the CrownI recently followed up my reading of The Blue Sword with its prequel/companion, The Hero and the Crown by Robin McKinley, another book for Once Upon a Time.  The books are separated by a few centuries and feature (nearly) all different characters, so either could be read independently.  I read them in publishing order, but I almost wish I had read them chronologically, as I think The Hero and the Crown provides more depth to The Blue Sword, more so than happens the other way around.

I enjoyed the book in a lot of ways, and I feel like I could see McKinley’s development as a writer even between these two books.  There are strong characters, awesome magic, and really interesting dragons.  And…there are problems.  But I’ll get to that in a bit.

The Hero and the Crown focuses on characters who featured as legends in The Blue Sword, particularly Aerin.  The daughter of the King of Damar and his foreign wife, Aerin is viewed with mistrust and disdain by her father’s court.  She’s hot-tempered and impetuous, and strives to prove her worth by killing dragons–who in this world, are a kind of pest, like wild dogs or wolves.  Bigger events surface when a Great Dragon comes out of the hills, and when war threatens with the demonic forces of the North.

I loved Aerin.  She’s likable even when she charges into foolish actions, and I find myself so wanting her to come into her own.  I love that even when she begins killing dragons (which seems like a traditional route to being a hero) she still has to struggle.  I love how she gradually grows throughout the first half of the book, growing in her relationships with others and in her acceptance of herself.  The one reason I’m glad I read The Blue Sword first is that I love having met her as a mythical figure, and now meeting her as a very real girl–it’s never as neat and simple as the myths.

Aerin is surrounded by solid characters as well, from her father who means well but doesn’t know what to do with his daughter; Tor, her dearest and sometimes only friend; Teka, her somewhat fussy nursemaid and surrogate mother; Galanna and Perlith, representatives of the hostile court.

The best character, though, is Talat, Aerin’s horse.  Once the king’s warhorse, Talat was lamed in battle and put out to pasture.  Aerin and Talat lean on each other to find their path, and form a beautiful bond.  A-girl-and-her-horse is an oft-told tale, but this one is really lovely.

I touched on the dragons a bit already, and I just have to say that I love it that they’re not the big bad fearsome and impressive dragons of most stories.  They’re about the size of dogs and treated like any other dangerous wild animal–but not as anything more impressive than that.  In fact, in this country, there’s very little honor in killing dragons.  The Great Dragons are more traditional, but most people consider them only myths…until one arrives, at least.

I don’t want to get into the second half of the book too much, to avoid spoilers, but I have to talk about it to discuss my chief problems with the book.  There’s a clear shift about midway through, as Aerin begins to deal with forces on a larger stage.  The plot shifts, and that’s fine–but I feel like the character shifts too, and that’s not.

It’s hard to pinpoint the exact problem or exactly what was missing, but it feels like Aerin stops making decisions for herself.  While she decided to fight dragons or to befriend Talat, later in the book it feels like she’s being moved around by circumstances.  She goes to fight a magician because of a prophecy; she goes through a battle using a sword that seems to move on its own; she climbs endless, endless, endless stairs and never once thinks about turning around.

I wouldn’t say that Aerin behaves out of character in the later parts of the book–but I don’t get a sense of her anymore being an active force in her own path (which, in its own way, is out of character…)  The actions she takes do make sense for her, but there’s a piece missing in the motivations behind the actions.  And that, I find frustrating.

The second half also introduces a new romantic interest, which turned out to be the worst of both worlds.  I didn’t hate that romance, but it never resonated with me either–and yet it was able to disrupt the development of the earlier romance which I had been enjoying.

I didn’t hate the entire second half of the book, by any means.  It was actually still a pretty good story–but it was just a bit off too, and it didn’t live up to the brilliant first half.

I read a review by Memory on Stella Matutina that describes all of this very well and raises some excellent points, if you want to explore the subject further.

I have to wonder if McKinley herself may have realized the issue here.  I’m reminded very much of Rose Daughter, one of her later books.  The heroine is also being pushed around by prophecies and expectations and even the usual format of “Beauty and the Beast”–but she ultimately makes decisions that turn everything on its head.  Choice is very heavily emphasized…so perhaps McKinley knows what happened in The Hero and the Crown.

There’s about half of a really amazing book here–and then a pretty good second half.  So in the end I do recommend it, but I wish I could recommend it more whole-heartedly!

Author’s Site: http://www.robinmckinley.com/

Other reviews:
Beyond Books
The Sleepless Reader
The Book Stop
Dab of Darkness
Anyone else?

Buy it here: The Hero and the Crown