The Fantastic Mr. Fox, Written and Read by Roald Dahl

Fantastic Mr. FoxLast week, I found myself with a long drive coming up and no audiobooks on hand!  So I dropped by my library and impulsively picked up The Fantastic Mr. Fox, without realizing that it was actually read by Roald Dahl himself.  I’m calling a talking fox appropriate for Once Upon a Time too.  I had a good time listening–but also came to the conclusion that I’m just too old for this story.

I had seen the movie already (and by the way, great choice of casting with George Clooney as the voice of Mr. Fox) and found the book to be more or less the same storyline.  Boggis, Bunce and Bean are poultry farmers, and rather an unpleasant bunch.  Mr. Fox routinely steals from the three of them to feed his family, until Boggis, Bunce and Bean strike back, first with guns and then trying to dig or starve the Fox family out of their hole.

It’s an enjoyable, exciting story, with lots of Dahl’s flair for language and rhyme.  There are tense moments and humorous moments and a few gross moments, of the kind aimed at kids.  All in all, it is fun.  And I might have quite liked it if I had read it when I was younger and more willing to take matters at face-value.

But.  The trouble is, I can’t get behind Mr. Fox as a hero.  Because he is stealing from Boggis, Bunce and Bean.  Dahl tells us that they’re terrible people, but I don’t see much actual evidence of that.  Yes, they’re rather rude, unhygenic, and ruthless in hunting down the Fox family…but you can’t steal from someone just because they’re rude and don’t bathe often enough.  This isn’t Robin Hood stealing from the oppressive Sheriff of Nottingham.

Even the villains’ ruthlessness towards the foxes is an uncertain indicator, because it’s not quite clear what they understand about the foxes’ intelligence and level of civilization.  Using lethal force to defend property is going too far, but that’s when applied to humans.  Shepherds and farmers have defended crops and livestock from predators since time immemorial.  As an animal lover, I’d rather they let the animals live, but I can’t say they’re evil if they take extreme measures.

So while I’m supposed to be cheering on crafty Mr. Fox, I never could quite avoid seeing Boggis, Bunce and Bean as honest (if unpleasant) businessmen taking necessary steps to defend their livelihoods from a persistent and unrepentant thief.

The situation is made worse because at one point Badger asks Mr. Fox if the stealing bothers him.  Mr. Fox jumps on something of a soapbox about how he’s only trying to keep his family from starving (because they’re under seige at this point) and after all, Boggis, Bunce and Bean want to kill him and he doesn’t want to do any such thing to them, so stealing is comparatively minor.  Which is all well and good except he’s ignoring the larger cause and effect.  He didn’t start stealing because they were hunting him.  They started hunting him because he was stealing.

I should note that I do like the occasional roguish hero–Captain Jack Sparrow is one of my all-time favorite characters.  But Mr. Fox does not have the charm of a Captain Jack, or the noble ideals of a Robin Hood, and at the end of the day…he was just not that fantastic.

But the audiobook only took an hour of my life (while driving), and it was well worth the time just to satisfy my curiosity about the book.  And I did enjoy listening–even if it had some issues!

The best part, though, was that the book was read by Roald Dahl.  And somehow, he just sounded the way I would expect Roald Dahl to sound. 🙂

Author’s Site:

Other reviews:
Reading to Know
Strange and Random Happenstance
Anyone else?

Buy it here: Fantastic Mr. Fox (CD)

16 thoughts on “The Fantastic Mr. Fox, Written and Read by Roald Dahl

  1. Recently, I’ve been getting Roald Dahl audiobooks for my nephew to listen-while-reading. I was certain that I’d listened to Fantastic Mr. Fox as an audiobook and felt exactly the same way about it as you describe above. But when I checked my LibraryThing books, I apparently didn’t record reading it. So I’ve been pondering whether I dreamed the whole thing. Now that I read your review, though, I’m CERTAIN that I read it because you describe my remembered feelings exactly. 🙂 I’ll still have my nephew read it, though. I think he’ll like it.

  2. I haven’t read this or seen the film so it might be interesting to do at least one! I think the point you make about the fox is interesting though – let’s face it, the fox is more often not the baddie in the story so I suppose it’s difficult to relate to him being the hero. After all, he did eat the Gingerbread Man.

    1. I’d go for the audiobook–it’s shorter than the movie! Great point about the Fox’s usual role. Maybe the trouble was that Dahl kept him as the thief and trickster, while trying to make him the hero. Hard to balance that!

  3. You are definitely reading this book from an adult perspective! It says something about the moral values of the book, though, that you had so many concerns about the story. That could be something for parents to discuss with their children after reading it together.

  4. This is my father’s favourite Roald Dahl novel from his childhood. I think perhaps as a child you would have enjoyed it more but as an adult you find yourself asking too many questions. Perfectly valid questions I may add but they will certainly detract from enjoying the story for what it is. I haven’t read the book since I was a child but I did see the film and must admit I didn’t enjoy the story as much as I remember doing as a child.

  5. I’m sad to hear you didn’t enjoy this as much as you could have, but your concerns make perfect sense. I’d have them too. (I was somehow never a great fan of Dahl’s work, so this is one of the books I haven’t read and now I’m pretty sure I won’t. Oh, well. ^-^) Still. I’m glad to hear you had fun with it anyway! ^-^

      1. Me too! They’re the ones I most vividly remember reading (or having read to us; I was blessed with several extremely good readers in primary school). I think it’s fairly normal for children’s books, especially the older ones, to strain credulity in some way or another, though? Most of the books I recall reading as a child and have reread have had something like this, or questions about the world-building.

        1. Well, Matilda certainly strains credulity a bit too (she reads Dickens at four years old? Really?) and of course Charlie does as well…but I don’t mind a little suspension of disbelief for some fun story elements. Straining the ethics was harder to get past…

          1. Some kids do, you know. I wasn’t much older than Matilda when I first read Dickens. For me, that scene in the library is one of the most realistic scenes in the book because that was my life. That’s how my childhood went. (Granted, I could have done without the massive list of “Look at Matilda’s reading credentials!” that undoes pretty much everything Dahl’s accomplished up to that point. T-T But apart from that…)

Share Your Thoughts

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s