Blog Hop: Long Languishing Books

Today’s blog hop is hosted by The Fake Steph, and the question is:

Is there a book that has been languishing on your TBR pile even though you spent months anticipating its release?

I can honestly say I don’t–technically–do this.  People who have seen my bookcases probably won’t believe me when I say this, but I am extremely selective about what books I buy.  Unless I really trust an author, I rarely ever buy a book that I haven’t already read.  So I rarely end up with much anticipated books actually in my house that I don’t get to for ages.  I get unread ones sometimes, but they tend to be gifts or ridiculously cheap impulse buys, or something from a book swap.

But I am guilty of the spirit of this.  I see a book, or hear of a book that’s coming out, get deeply excited…and then don’t actually read it for months or even years.  I don’t know why that is, so if someone has a theory, I’d love to hear it!  My best guess is that there are just too many books, and I get sidetracked.  Or I’m somehow waiting for the “right” moment.

And then sometimes I’m not sure about reading a book…but it just stays in the back of my mind as one I ought to read some time.  Pirates! by Celia Rees was one of those.  I saw it in bookstores and the library for years, and kept thinking I ought to read it (because, I mean–pirates!)  This was one that languished on my pile.  I saw it at a book swap, got quite excited, brought it home…and didn’t actually read it for months.  When I finally did, it was good, although I didn’t love it enough to keep it.

I do think a factor may be that there’s just always another book.  So the To Be Read list is not so much a pile, as a line…and it takes some time for books to get to the front!

Anyone else see this in their own reading?  Anyone with a theory on why we don’t just read the books we get excited about?

NaNoWriMo, Day 1: Launching!

Today has felt more like a holiday than yesterday did, and I think that’s down to the start of NaNoWriMo!  For those not familiar with it, that’s short for National Novel Writing Month, when lots of crazy people all over the world set a goal to write 50,000 words of a novel during the month of November.

I participated last year, and blogged throughout the month–just click the NaNoWriMo category to see my past posts.  This year I’m jumping in again, and so far I’m mostly in the first blush of excitement about it all.  We’ll see where I am in two weeks!

My plan this year is to try to do something with a novel that stalled out a few years back.  Here’s the description from my NaNo page:

The Monster and the Prince

Maggie only meant to pose as a princess for a few days–just long enough for the real princess to escape with the guardsman she loved, and avoid an arranged marriage to the King of Gaicaveene.  Maggie didn’t expect the king to be a magician, as cruel as he is powerful.  Confessing the lie is immediately out of the question, and so she finds herself trapped within the king’s castle, and her assumed identity.

Michael had meant to rescue a princess when he rode to the castle, only to discover that the princess was dead before he ever arrived.  Defeated in battle and under a curse, he’s trapped there with no way out and no purpose–at least until the “Princess Evangelina” arrives.

This may sound familiar to some of you, because I posted the first chapter some while back.  The trouble is, I only got about three chapters in last time I attempted this novel, before I got stuck in writer’s block and confronted with a lot of plot problems.  But I really liked those first three chapters, and I liked some of the concepts, I just couldn’t quite figure out how to make it work.

So–my hope is that the frenetic pace of NaNoWriMo will keep me moving forward, and that inspiration will strike when I need it.  As actually tends to happen at times.  It did last November, anyway. 🙂

And if it all flails and crashes and burns, I have a couple of short stories I’ve been wanting to write too.  So my goal is 50,000 words, and whether that’s the rest of this novel, or just a chunk of the novel and then a few short stories, either way I’m happy.

To start off, I woke up early this morning to write before work, then wrote again in the evening.  The daily goal is 1,667 words, and I have 2,781 so far–higher than I did the first day last year!  I really wanted to get a strong start, both for the psychological benefits, and because it means I can go out to my writing group tomorrow evening.  Perhaps it’s slightly counterintuitive to skip a writing group so that I can stay home and write…but it does take ALL evening.  Getting a headstart today means I (hopefully) can go out and not kill my word count tomorrow.  We’ll see! Continue reading “NaNoWriMo, Day 1: Launching!”

When October Goes…

Happy Halloween!

Today also marks the end of the Readers Imbibing Peril “challenge,” so I wanted to do a round-up, and some brief reviews of creepy autumn movies I never had time to review properly.

I’m happy to say I met my original plans for this reading experience (click for reviews), reading some Sherlock Holmes (The Valley of Fear), some Agatha Christie (Murder on the Orient Express), and Jane Austen’s Northanger Abbey.  I’m also counting Susan Kay’s Phantom and The Girl Who Fell Beneath Fairyland and Led the Revels There by Catherynne M. Valente.  And of course I participated in The Graveyard Book read-along.

Considering this is not my normal genre, not a bad list!  Now, on to the screen…
where there’s a fair amount of overlap.

Northanger Abbey (2007): I like to watch a movie version of Austen before reading a new book by her; it’s not my usual practice for other books, but it helps me sort out Austen’s large casts of characters.  I really enjoyed the movie version, which is a bit sillier than the book (and changes a few details) but is still pretty accurate–and enormous fun.  I liked that it brought to life some funny moments that Austen skated past, and I loved that Sally Sparrow (Carey Mulligan) from Doctor Who‘s “Blink” was in this!  It wasn’t really a very creepy movie (less creepy than “Blink”) but in a way that’s the point–it’s a creepy setting where nothing creepy is really going on.

Rebecca (1940): This is one of my favorite Hitchcock films.  So mysterious, and it’s so brilliantly handled. Joan Fontaine is wonderful as the second Mrs. De Winter, Judith Anderson is terrifying as the creepy Mrs. Danvers, and I just love how Hitchcock makes Rebecca SO PRESENT, when we never see her at all.  I can just imagine how awful this would be if they made it today–we’d probably get a bloody flashback of Rebecca’s death.  Here, Olivier’s narration is so brilliant and so vivid.  This is a wonderful movie for a cold dark night.

Murder on the Orient Express (1974): After reading the book, I was curious about the movie.  I found it very accurate, in good ways and bad.  Like the book, it takes some time to get started, and doesn’t really hit its stride until murder has been committed and Poirot begins his investigation and interviews.  I enjoyed seeing Sean Connery and an almost unrecognizable Ingrid Bergman.  Lauren Bacall was in a way lovely as well, but at the same time, terribly cast.  Her character felt the most different from the book, and I liked the book version better–but I couldn’t see Bacall playing that part that way.  Poirot himself seemed angrier and more forceful in some of his scenes, which I can’t say worked all that well for me.  But I did love the way they handled his “here’s what happened” speech.  A flashback would have been awful in Rebecca, but here it was a brilliant device to actually show the murder.  Almost no blood, but it was still so creepy.  This one couldn’t have been made in 1940–the censor board never would have stood for the ending.

I’m still never going to be a fan of horror movies or books…but I’ve enjoyed venturing into the shadow lands a bit!  Perfect for getting me in the mood for fall.

A Gothic Parody from Miss Austen

Forgive my battered library copy…I’ll be buying a better one.

I finally got to my last goal-book for R. I. P.Northanger Abbey by Jane Austen.  There’s even a little more of a “finally” to this, considering it was a chosen book for my high school book club and I never got around to it then.  But maybe it’s just as well; I don’t know if I would have found Austen as easy a read then–and I loved the book now.

Northanger Abbey is a spoof on gothic novels.  I haven’t actually read many, but it doesn’t seem to matter.  A lot of the concepts have slipped into the cultural awareness, and it always seemed pretty clear what Jane was poking fun at.

The book is about Catherine Morland who, the narrator tells us, doesn’t seem at all suitable to be a heroine–for instance, her father “is not in the least addicted to locking up his daughters.”  Catherine loves reading about heroines, and simply adores gothic novels.  Her opportunity for adventure comes when she’s invited to accompany some family friends to Bath.  There she makes the acquaintance of the charming Mr. Tilney and his sister, who eventually invite her to their family home of Northanger Abbey.  It’s the perfect setting for a gothic novel and Catherine’s imagination runs wild.

This book has the most delightful feel to it.  It’s the lightest Austen I’ve read, with a wonderful sense of humor throughout.  It’s frequently meta, with a narrator who comments on the ongoing story, noting at times how it does and doesn’t fit a gothic novel, with some lovely tongue-in-cheek observations.  Austen herself feels much more present here than in her other novels that I’ve read.

The characters are vivid, and the cast is a little smaller than usual, so the characters don’t get lost among the crowd.  Catherine is rather silly at times, but she’s also very honorable and good-hearted.  I don’t admire her as much as Elizabeth Bennet, but I like her very much.  She shows good character development as well, maturing through the novel.

And Mr. Tilney–well, with all due respect to Mr. Darcy, it takes Colin Firth five hours to crack a smile in the BBC miniseries.  It’s so nice here to meet an Austen hero with a perpetual smile.  Mr. Tilney makes jokes and is charming and fun.  I was talking about this book with two friends, and the opinion was unanimous in appreciation of Mr. Tilney.  Another note: even though I’m calling him “Mr. Tilney,” the narration actually refers to him as Henry at times, and you can’t imagine how much more human that makes him seem than the perpetual Mr. This and Mr. That we usually see in Austen.

The other major characters are Isabella Thorpe and her brother John who…well, I hate to give things away about them.  But Catherine learns something about real and imagined intrigue, and the difference between books and life.

Which reminds me–there’s a splendid rant from Austen at the end of chapter five, about the poor regard for novels and how wonderful they really are.  Bravi.

I think I’ll be recommending Northanger Abbey next time I’m talking to someone thinking about picking up Austen.  It’s a good gateway book, distinctly Austen but lighter and a less dense read.  And my new favorite!

Other reviews:
The Librarian Next Door
Allegraphy
Lost Generation Reader
All Things Bright and Beautiful
Any other Austen fans?

Saturday Snapshot: Halloween Decorations

I’ve mentioned in previous posts that I love walking around my neighborhood.  Lately, neighbors have been breaking out the Halloween decorations, so with the holiday coming up next week, I thought I’d share a few!

These horrid things live next door to me.  I don’t even dislike spiders, but knee-high creatures that suddenly appear as I come around a bush–yikes!  First there was one, but they seem to be multiplying…

This is a favorite–cute with a little ghostliness! Continue reading “Saturday Snapshot: Halloween Decorations”